Writ petition during mid-way elections was dismissed with liberty to approach later, relying on a Supreme Court judgment regarding lack of interference when elections are ongoing.
Writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to avail of remedies after completion of election process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
15 WRIT PETITION NO. 2348 OF 2015
PARASRAM GYANBA GADEKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Patil Hanmant V. And Mr. Londhe S S GP for Respondent State:Mr. S.S.Tope
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: March 02, 2015
PER COURT :-
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
agp/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak SansthaReferred¶8
(2001) 8 SCC 509 · Who else cites this
PARASRAM GYANBA GADEKAR
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
