Contempt petition disposed on Explanation in affidavit-in-reply that non-governmental members were not invited due to expired terms and President's rule; factual dispute on term expiry not examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2014 IN WP/3633/2014
IGBALSINGH PRITAMSING GILL
VERSUS
VIKRAM KUMAR, COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Karkare S.D. AGP for Respondent State:Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: March 02, 2015
PER COURT :-
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
agp/-
IGBALSINGH PRITAMSING GILL
VIKRAM KUMAR, COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD
ANOTHER
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
