The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKC 1/1 19-WP-2329-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2014
Prakash J. Mhatre ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the State – Respondent No. 1. Mr. B. B. Sharma for Respondent No. 2. Mr. S. S. Deokar for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND M. S. SONAK, JJ .
15th December, 2015 .
P.C.
None for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Gram Panchayat submits that the crematorium has been constructed and the cost of the construction has been disbursed to the contractor.
2] None appeared for the petitioner on 22 September 2015. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
CHANDKA
Prakash J. Mhatre
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
