The High Court of Bombay allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition filed regarding the rejection of an application by the Tahsildar, Kurla Mulund, based on statements from the AGP.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SKC 1/1 3-WP-12446-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12446 OF 2015
Ayush P. Bastav ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND M. S. SONAK, JJ .
15th December, 2015 .
P.C.
The learned AGP on instructions submits that by a communication dated 12 February 2015, the Tahsildar, Kurla Mulund has informed the petitioner that his application has been rejected and the petitioner may resort to appropriate remedy.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
CHANDKA
Ayush P. Bastav
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
