The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner has an alternative remedy available under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 WRIT PETITION NO. 227 OF 2015
JIJABHAU HARIBHAU PRADHAN VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sandanshiv M.b. Mrs. VA Shinde, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Y.K.Bobade, Adv. h/for Mr. Tope Sambhaji S., Adv. For R/2 And 3
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ. Dated: January 14, 2015
PER COURT :-
( N.W. SAMBRE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
bdv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed considering the availability of remedial alternatives.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JIJABHAU HARIBHAU PRADHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
