Petitioner's appeal tendered to the Additional Divisional Commissioner was to be disposed of within six months. Upon this assurance, the writ petition was disposed of without further directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp315.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 315 OF 2015
Miraji s/o Vyankat Maindad .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. P.B. Gapat, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. V. A. Shinde, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & N. W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
( N. W. SAMBRE ) JUDGE
( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE
dyb
Miraji s/o Vyankat Maindad
The Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad
R.M. BORDE
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
