On learning of the Division Bench decision in WP. 4110/2014, the Court held the petitioner not entitled to any equitable relief. The writ petition was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.01.wp.224.15.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 224 /2015 (Eknath s/o Banikrao Dhanwade vs.Divisional Controller, State Road Transport Corporation and another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. M V Bute, Adv.for petitioner
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 19th January, 2015.
In view of the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 4110/2014 decided on 19th September 2014, the petitioner is not entitled to any equitable relief.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Eknath s/o Banikrao Dhanwade
Divisional Controller, State Road Transport Corporation
another
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court