Dismissed

Kaushalya D/O Rammanohar Singh v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of Forest, Mumbai and 3 Others

Bombay HC19 Jan 2015WP/223/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, rejected a writ petition challenging a Tribunal's view. The court held no case was made out for interference as the distance between Chimur and Tadoba was minimal. The petition stands rejected.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition stands rejected.

What the court decided

Kaushalya D/O Rammanohar Singh Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

19.01.wp.223.15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 223 /2015 (Kaushalya d/o Rammanohar Singh vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶5

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr. N.A. Lalwani, Adv.for petitioner Mr. A.D.Sonak, AGP for respondent no.1

¶7

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &

¶8

Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 19^th January, 2015.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

We do not find that the view taken by the learned Tribunal could be said to be either perverse of erroneous.

¶11

In any case, the distance between Chimur and Tadoba is hardly 30 kms.

¶12

In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Writ Petition stands rejected.

¶13

JUDGEJUDGE

¶14

sahare

Kaushalya D/O Rammanohar Singh v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of Forest, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Kaushalya D/O Rammanohar Singh v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of Forest, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hruday Kumar Babulal Parate and 4 Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Sitabuldi, Nagpur

The Commissioner of Income (Central), Nagpur Vs Buldhana Urban Co-Operative Credit Soc.Ltd., Buldhana

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur Vs M/S Ktps Employees Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. Nagpur

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Thr. Ex. Engineer Vs Kawadu S/O. Narayan Tandulkar and Others.

Ms. Swati Dindorkar- Katole Vs Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth through Its Registrar, Akola

Eknath S/O Barikrao Dhanwade Vs Divisional Controller, State Road Transport Corporation, Buldhana and Another