This writ petition dealt with the petitioners' representation for accommodation as para teachers. The court directed the Zilla Parishad to decide the representations on merits expeditiously within five months.
Respondent No. 2 to decide representations on merits within five months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2179.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2179 OF 2015
Ashok Shahdeo Khande and another .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri Pradip K. Wagh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri D. B. Bhange, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri R. B. Dhaware, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. L ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that, the petitioners were working as Wastishala Teachers. As per the scheme they are required to be accommodated as para teachers. The representations are given from time to time, however, the same are not considered.
2 wp 2179.15
V. L ACHLIYA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Feb. 15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is obligated to decide the petitioners' representations regarding para teacher accommodation in accordance with Government Resolutions.
Ashok Shahdeo Khande and another
The State of Maharashtra
Zilla Parishad
S. V. Gangapurwala
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
