Bench directed the respondent Committee to expeditiously decide pending validation proceedings concerning the petitioner's tribe claim, preferring a timeline of three months, and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to decide validation proceedings expeditiously within three months; discharge of the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2170.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2170 OF 2015
Puja Prakash Thakur .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri Shaikh, Advocate h/f Shri Anil S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. S. A. Dhumal, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri Pravin S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. L ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that, the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending with the respondent No. 2/Committee since 2005. The same is not yet decided. The respondent No. 2 be directed to decide the same expeditiously.
2 wp 2170.15
[ V. L ACHLIYA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Feb. 15
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent committee shall expeditiously decide the pending validation proceedings regarding the petitioner's tribe claim.
Whether a direction to decide within three months is appropriate.
Puja Prakash Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
The Committee
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
V. L ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
