Petitioner sought направление to register an FIR. The State advised that the petitioner's statement was already recorded and a decision would be communicated within seven days. The court disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No.21
WP 217.15
SSK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 217 OF 2015
Mr. Nitin Ashok Yewale ….Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. R. N .Kachave, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 5th MAY, 2015.
P.C.:
Heard.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Shubhada S Kadam
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
