This brief order grants leave for the withdrawal of criminal applications and dismisses them as withdrawn. The judgment contains no substantive legal discussion.
Leave to withdraw the criminal applications is granted. Applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No.production
apl 101 and 102.14
SSK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NOS. 101 AND 102 OF 2014
Mr. Ramakant Jadhav ….Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, advocate for the applicant. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 5th MAY, 2015.
P.C.:
Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to
withdraw the criminal applications. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The
criminal applications stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Shubhada S Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
