Three writ petitions were disposed of by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide on the petitioners' objections within six months. Writ petitions 1916 and 1917 of 2015 were then disposed of.
Direction to Respondent No. 3 to decide on objections within six months; disposal of Writ Petitions 1916 and 1917.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 1916 17 & 20.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1916 OF 2015
Nizam Babumiya Jahagirdar
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1917 OF 2015
Faruq Burhansaheb Shaikh(Jahagirdar) and another
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1920 OF 2015
Parvin Nizam Shaikh(Jahagirdar) and another
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
Mr.V.S. Bedre advocate for the petitioners Mrs. S.P.Daund, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ Dated : 23rd March, 2015.
PER COURT :-
{2} wp 1916 17 & 20.15.odt
the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today and it is accordingly directed.
2 Writ petitions stand disposed of.
(V.K. JADHAV, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)
vbd
Nizam Babumiya Jahagirdar
Faruq Burhansaheb Shaikh
Parvin Nizam Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
