Dismissing Writ Petition No.1918/2015, the Court held that the petitioner's claim to acquire released land is unentertainable as the underlying sale deed was void due to lack of title post-acquisition. The petition is deemed devoid of substance.
Writ Petition dismissed; petitioner at liberty to pursue other available legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(1) WP NO.1918/2015
11 WRIT PETITION NO. 1918 OF 2015
CHANDRAKANT RANOJI MAGAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Paranjape Prakash S AGP for Respondents: Smt. V.A.Shinde
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: February 23, 2015
PER COURT :-
AGP/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(2) WP NO.1918/2015
AGP/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking release of acquired land on the strength of a subsequent sale deed is maintainable when the prior title was extinguished by acquisition?
Whether the High Court can entertain a petition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 when the sale deed
CHANDRAKANT RANOJI MAGAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
