4 It is seen that the petitioner was released on 11.4.2011, however, instead of reporting back in time, he was late by one day in surrendering back to the prison. However, he himself reported back to the prison. As far as overstay of furlough in the year 2014 is concerned, he was released on furlough on 7.2.2014, however, according to the petitioner, as he fell sick, he was late by 29 days in surrendering back to the prison. It is noticed that on both the occasions, the petitioner has himself surrendered back to the prison. On the first occasion, he was just one day late and on the second occasion, though he was late by 29 days, but he has himself surrendered to the prison and it is not the case that he had to be arrested and brought back to the prison. It is further seen that on two other occasions, the petitioner was released on furlough i.e. on 9.9.2009 and 16.2.2013 and on both these occasions, the petitioner reported back to the prison in time. The report from the jail also shows that the conduct of the petitioner in prison, is satisfactory. In this view of the matter, we are inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner.
