The applicant sought copies of orders from three previous matters. The Court noted prior disposals by order and disposed of the prayer as non-arising.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 6.cri.appw.366.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 366 OF 2014 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 867 OF 2013
Kisanbaba Devbaba Giri .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the applicant Mr. A.S. Shitole A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J. & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATED : NOVEMBER 16, 2015
P.C.:
1 The applicant has prayed for the copies of the orders passed by this Court prior to the disposal of Criminal Application No. 487 of 2013, Criminal Application No. 490 of 2013 and Criminal Writ Petition No. 867 of 2013 preferred by the applicant. We have gone through the record. Criminal Writ Petition No. 867 of 2013 was disposed of by this Court by order dated 28.11.2013. Prior to that no order was passed by this Court in the said matter.
1 of 2
jdk 2 6.cri.appw.366.14.doc
2 As far as Criminal Application Nos. 487 of 2013 and 490 of 2013 are concerned, both these matters were disposed of by common order dated 7.4.2014. Prior to that date, no orders were passed by this Court in these two applications. In such case, the question of furnishing the applicant copies of the orders passed earlier in these three matters does not arise, hence, application is disposed of.
3 Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in Nashik Road Central Prison.
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Kisanbaba Devbaba Giri
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
