Petitioners sought permission to withdraw writ petitions challenging termination as they intended to file an appeal against the termination order before the University and College Tribunal.
Petitioners permitted to withdraw writ petitions; petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.wp1484 & 1486_2013.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1484 OF 2013
Somnath Sakharam Dhande … Petitioner vs.
The President, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha, Satara & Ors.
… Respondents
WRIT PETITION NO. 1486 OF 2013
Sunil Prabhakar Joshi … Petitioner vs. The President, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha, Satara & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Akshay Shinde, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. Amit Borkar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 22nd January, 2015.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would file an Appeal against the order of their termination before the University and College Tribunal. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petitions in view of the existence of an alternate remedy.
The petitioners are permitted to withdraw the Writ Petitions.
The Writ Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 of 1
Somnath Sakharam Dhande
Sunil Prabhakar Joshi
The President, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha, Satara
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
