The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to decide the petitioner's pending parole extension application within two months and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Directed the Divisional Commissioner to decide the parole extension application within two months; disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 crwp 1477.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1477 OF 2015
Umesh Budhaji Pagare, Prisoner No. C-4593
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Shri Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner (Appointed) Shri S. G. Karlekar, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 18TH DECEMBER, 2015.
PER COURT :
. It is submitted that, the Divisional Commissioner has not decided the application of the present petitioner seeking second extension of parole.
2 crwp 1477.15
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Dec. 15
Umesh Budhaji Pagare
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
