The High Court disposed of Criminal Application No. 798 of 2012. It directed the Magistrate First Class to pass appropriate orders expeditiously in the underlying criminal matter based on the B summary report within three months.
Directed the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders in RCC No. 390 of 2011 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cri apln 798.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 798 OF 2012
Virendra S/o Bhaskarrao Wagh and others
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri Paresh B. Patil, Advocate for Applicants. Shri Govind O. Wattamwar, A.P.P. for the Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 18TH DECEMBER, 2015.
PER COURT :
. Mr. Patil, the learned counsel submits that, the state has submitted B summary report before the Judicial Magistrate First Class. However, as the stay is operating in the present application the orders are not passed.
2 cri apln 798.12
[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Dec. 15
Virendra S/o Bhaskarrao Wagh and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
S. V. Gangapurwala
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
