5 Respondent No. 2 has two sons from the deceased Prithviraj Roshanlal Bhisen and respondent No. 3 has one daughter from the deceased Sampat Makalal Choudhary. At the time of death, the deceased were in their thirties. Respondent No. 2 is aged 26 years and respondent No. 3 is 30 years old. In these circumstances, we felt that the compensation amount of Rs.3,50,000/- to each of respondents No. 2 and 3 would be inadequate and accordingly, we suggested the learned counsel for the petitioners to increase the amount of the compensation. The learned counsel for the petitioners accordingly have taken instructions from the petitioners and they have shown willingness to increase the compensation amount at Rs.4,50,000/- to each of respondents No. 2 and 3. Accordingly the petitioners have paid to each of respondents No. 2 and 3 an amount of Rs.25,000/- in cash and an amount of Rs.1,75,000/- by way of demand drafts. Respondents No. 2 and 3 acknowledge the said amount. 6 It can thus be seen that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Perusal of the complaint, makes it clear that the allegations are totally personal in nature. In these circumstances and especially in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Narinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2014 AIR (SCW) 2065, we are of the view that no purpose would be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending except burdening the Criminal Courts which are already
