Single judge dismissed a Criminal Appeals bail application filed by Ajay Ramkit Yadav challenging an FIR. The court held that since the FIR disclosed prima facie offence and the charge sheet was ready, the application was not entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
16)APL124.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2015
Ajay Ramkit Yadav & Ors. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the applicants. Ms. U. V. Kejriwal, APP for the State
CORAM:-RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED : -21/08/2015
P. C.:
None appears for the applicants. Heard Ms. Kejriwal,
learned APP for the State.
2 This petition is filed for quashing the FIR / C. R. No. 2 of 2015 registered with Malad Police Station for offence punishable u/s 324 r/w 34 of IPC. We have perused the copy of FIR annexed at Exhibit-C. FIR does disclose prima facie, commission of offence.
3 Be that as it may, the learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the said FIR is investigated and charge-sheet
1/2
2
16)APL124.15
is ready and it is in the process of filing.
4 In the above circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the application, the same is dismissed.
(V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application ought to be entertained when the FIR discloses prima facie commission of the offence and the charge sheet is ready for filing.
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
V. L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
