Petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner counsel did not appear on the date of hearing or on an earlier mentioned occasion. Rule discharged.
Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1411.01
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1411 OF 2001 WITH CA/10220/2004 IN WP/1411/2001
BHAGWAN MANIKRAO CHAVAN AND ANR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A S Golegaonkar (absent) AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. U.S. Mote Advocate for Respondents 3 and 5 : Mr. U.B. Bondar
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2015
P.C. :-
None appears for the petitioners. Even on earlier occasion i.e. on 5.1.2015 none appeared for the petitioners. In the light of this,
petition is dismissed in default. Rule discharged.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( A. V. NIRGUDE, J. )
rlj/
Bhagwan Manikrao Chavan and Anr
State of Maharashtra and Ors
A. V. Nirgude
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
