Court extended ad hoc appointments of two doctors for one more year pending conclusion of a departmental enquiry, then dismissed the civil application.
Ad hoc appointments continued for one year or until departmental enquiry concludes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) CA290.2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 290 OF 2015 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 18 OF 2011
Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi), Ahmednagar.
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr Sanjay R. Choukidar, Advocate for the applicant Mr K. J. Ghute-Patil, AGP for respondent-State Mr S. B. Talekar, Advocate for respondents No. 18 and 19
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 12TH , 2015
PER COURT :-
[ V.K. JADHAV, J. ]
[ A.V. NIRGUDE,J. ]
sgp
Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi), Ahmednagar
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
