COURT
Petitioner directed to carry out demarcation of the plot in presence of legal heirs of Respondent No.5 and pay fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.1345.2014_37.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1345 OF 2014
Mazhar Hussain ... Petitioner
Vs.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Respondent
Mr.Pankaj Kawali i/b Kiran Mohite for the Petitioner Ms.Vandana Mahadik for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 27th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
The petitioner is permitted to bring the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.5 on record. The learned Counsel for the legal heirs does not have any objection for the same. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Mr.Rohit Sakhadeo, the learned Counsel, waives notice on behalf of the legal heirs.
Heard.
It appears from a reading of the order of the Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Zone III, dated 29.12.2012 that both the parties were directed to approach the City Survey office for the purpose of carrying out the measurements for demarcation of the plot under reference. It is the
1 / 2
wp.1345.2014_37.doc
case of the petitioner that the petitioner had approached the City Survey office for the purpose of carrying out the demarcation. It is not the case of the legal heirs of the respondent No.5 that they had approached the City Survey Officer for the measurement of the land in question in the presence of the petitioner.
It appears that the measurement and the demarcation is required to be carried out in the presence of both the parties. The City Survey officer is, therefore, directed to carry out the demarcation of the plot in question, as per the order of the Deputy Municipal Commissioner dated 29.10.2012 on the deposit of the necessary fees payable to the City Survey officer, by the petitioner. The parties undertake to appear before the City Survey officer on 16.2.2015 so that the issuance of notice to the parties could be dispensed with.
With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
2 / 2
Mazhar Hussain
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
