The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No.1240 of 2012, holding that the legal issue involved had been answered against the petitioners in a prior reported judgment.
Writ Petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.1240.2012_26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1240 OF 2012
Anil Vishwanath Karnik & Ors. ... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Mihir Desai for the Petitioners Mr.A.B. Ketkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No.1 Mr.Rui Rodrigues for Resp. No.3
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 27th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
Heard. The learned Counsel for the respondents states that the issue involved in this case stands answered against the petitioners by the judgment reported in 2011 (6) ALL MR 689 .
Mr.Desai, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, fairly admits the statement.
Hence, for the reasons recorded in the judgment reported in the 2011 (6) ALL MR 689 , the Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2011 (6) ALL MR 689Referred¶12
Anil Vishwanath Karnik & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Vasanti A. Naik
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
