Petitioner challenged non-appointment. Court disposed of writ petition on merits as grievance became redressed during pendency due to respondent granting appointment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 21.04.wp.106.14.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 106/2014 ( Ku. Przaveena Rambhau Doifode vs. The Education Officer (Pri) Z.P. Nagpur and others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.N.Shende, Adv. for petitioner
Dr.B.G.Kulkarni, Adv.for Respondent nos.3 & 4
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATED : 21st April, 2015.
Heard.
Mr. P.N.Shende, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, as during the pendency of the petition, the respondent-Education Officer, has granted approval to the appointment of the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid statement, we dispose of the Writ Petition, with no order as to costs.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Ku. Przaveena Rambhau Doifode
The Education Officer (Pri) Z.P. Nagpur
others
Vasanti A. Naik
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court