Contempt petition challenging non-compliance with an order to reinstate the petitioner. The Court held that reinstatement was stayed due to a pending Supreme Court appeal and disposed of the petition without costs.
Contempt petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
cp8.1 5
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.8 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2328 OF 2014 (D)
Ku.Sarita D/o Ramdas Bhoyar
-vs-
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr.A.K.Choube, counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.N.S.Khubalkar, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 20.04.2015.
By this contempt petition, the petitioner has sought action against the respondents for not complying with the judgment dated 16/09/2014 in Writ Petition No.2328 of 2014.
According to the petitioner, the respondents were duty bound to reinstate the petitioner on one of the vacant posts in the Other Backward Classes, as per the direction of this Court. Since the order is not complied, the contempt petition is filed.
Shri Khubalkar, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that against the judgment dated 16/09/2014, a special leave petition was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and hence, the petitioner was not immediately reinstated. It is stated that after the dismissal of the special leave petition, the petitioner is reinstated in service.
2/2
cp8.1 5
In view of the aforesaid, no action under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is necessary against the respondents. The Contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Ku. Sarita D/o Ramdas Bhoyar
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
