Disposed
Sudipto Ghosal v. Jaya Ghosal
Bombay HCTS/70/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court disposed of a testamentary suit pursuant to the parties' settlement via consent terms.
What did the court decide?
Suit disposed of in accordance with Consent Terms signed by parties.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
3-TS-70-13.DOC
¶2
Sharayu.
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 70 OF 2013
¶4
IN
¶5
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 362 OF 2013
¶6
Sudipto Ghosal
Versus
Jaya Ghosal & Anr.
¶7
...Plaintiff
¶8
...Defendants
¶9
Mr. Sudipto Ghosal, Plaintiff in person.
Mrs. A.S. Khushrushahi, a/w Mr. N. Almedia, for the Defendants.
¶10
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 19th August 2015
¶11
PC:-
¶12
1.The parties have settled their disputes. Consent Terms are
tendered. These are signed by the Plaintiff who appears in person
and by Defendants No. 1 and 2 and their Advocates. The Consent
Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The
Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as an
undertakings to the Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sudipto Ghosal
- respondent
Jaya Ghosal
Coram
AI extract
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court