D.v.Shrota and Anr. v. J.v.Shrota.
Bombay HCTS/28/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
54-TS-28-97.DOC
¶2
Sharayu.
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 28 OF 1997
¶4
IN
¶5
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 360 OF 1994
¶6
Mrs. Devkabai Velji Shrota & Anr.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Jethibai Dayalji Seta…Defendant
¶7
None for the Plaintiffs.
¶8
Mr. Rafique Mohammed Vanoo, for the Defendants No. 1A, 1B and
1C.
¶9
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:17th August 2015
¶10
PC:-
¶11
1.Despite the directions issued on 12th June 2015, none
appears for the Plaintiffs. Even on 9th June 2015 none was present
for the Plaintiffs. The directions issued on 12th June 2015 have not
been complied with. The Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mrs. Devkabai Velji Shrota
- respondent
Jethibai Dayalji Seta
Coram
AI extract
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court