The Court settled the testamentary suit through compromise. The consent terms were signed by both parties and accepted by the Court, resulting in the disposal of the suit with a refund of court fees.
Suit settled and disposed of in accordance with consent terms signed by parties; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-TS-20-15.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 20 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 812 OF 2014
Milind Vithal Valawalkar…Plaintiff
Versus
Shyamala Anil Puri…Defendant
Mr. S. S. Shamim, i/b M/s. Shamim & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Nita Mandhyan, i/b M/s. S. M. Associates, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 11th March 2015
PC:-
1.The suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are
signed by the Plaintiff, the Defendant and their respective
Advocates. The Consent Terms tendered are taken on record and
marked as “X” for identification. Undertakings in the Consent
Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.
2.The suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent
Terms. Refund of court fees, in accordance with the Rules. All
concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
1 of 2
906-TS-20-15.DOC
3.The Plaintiff and the Defendant, both are personally present
in Court.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court