The Bombay High Court (Testamentary Jurisdiction) in Suit No. 161 of 2014 allowed the Plaintiff's withdrawal of a testamentary suit under written instructions, dismissing the suit with no order as to costs and ordering refund of court fees.
Withdrawal of the suit allowed. Suit dismissed with no order as to costs. Refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-TS-161-14.DOC
Sharayu.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 161 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 856 OF 2010
Neeta Rudraji Patankar…Plaintiff
Versus
Tejas Ajit Rane…Defendants
Mr. Milind T. Shewale , for the Plaintiff.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:25th August 2015
PC:-
1. On written instructions from the Plaintiff, learned Advocate for the Plaintiff seeks to withdraw the Suit. The Suit is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
2. Refund of Court fees in accordance with the rules.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Neeta Rudraji Patankar
Tejas Ajit Rane
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court