A settlement suit was disposed of through consent terms executed in open court. The court recorded the signed terms and dispensed with the refund of court fee.
Suit disposed of in terms of consent; refund of court fee not ordered; Notice of Motion disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P4-SL542-15.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 542 OF 2015
M/s. Aidem Ventures Pvt. Ltd.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Mi Marathi Media Ltd.…Defendant
Mr. Vaibhav Krishna, i/b Juris Consillis, for the Plaintiff.
Mrs. Anita Castellino, i/b Bruno Castellino, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 24th August 2015
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2.The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are
signed by an authorised signatory for the Plaintiffs and an
authorised signatory for the Defendant, as also by the Advocate for
the Plaintiffs and the Advocate for the Defendant. Both signatories
are personally present in Court. The Consent Terms are taken on
record and marked “X” for identification. The undertakings in the
Consent Terms are accepted as understandings to the Court.
3.The suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent
Terms. Refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with Rules.
1 of 2
P4-SL542-15.DOC
4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
5. The pending Notice of Motion does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court