Una Hector Angelo v. Joseph Angelo
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court offered to allow the withdrawal of the testamentary suit and petition at the plaintiff's request, with refund of court fees, but the order does not record the final outcome of the withdrawal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-TS-114-13-TP-789-13.DOC
Sharayu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 114 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 789 OF 2013
Mrs. Una Hector Angelo…Plaintiff
alias Una Angelo
Versus
Joseph Angelo…Defendant
Mr. Sayeed Mulani, i/b M/s. Mulani & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Jacinta D'Silva, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 3rd March 2015
PC:-
1.At the request of the learned Advocate for the
Petitioner/Plaintiff, the Suit and Petition are allowed to be
withdrawn. Refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with the
Rules. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
Coram
G. S. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kaizer Taher Mithaiwala Vs Shamima Taher Mithaiwala and 4 Ors.
Zoeb Ali Hasanali and 4 Ors. Vs Zaitoon Taherali Hasanali Nalwala 2 Ors.
Vaijanath Hariram Pathare and 2 Ors. Vs Preveen Mahadeo Pathare and 3 Ors.
Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. Vs Sundeep Polymers Pvt.Ltd. and Anr. and the Official Liquidator (Third Party)