The Court held that a Chamber Summons seeking directions under Rule 404 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules is infructuous following the disposal of the connected Suit No. 9 of 2015 and disposed of the summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-CST-24-15.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 24 OF 2015
WITH
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 9 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1023 OF 2014
Raynah Braganza of Mumbai…Applicant
In the matter between
Raynah Braganza of Mumbai...Plaintiff
Versus
Necia Regello …Defendant
Ms. Geeta Sonanwane, a/w Denzil D'Mello, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. D. R. Mishra, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 4th March 2015
PC:-
1.In view of the order passed in the Suit No. 9 of 2015, the
Chamber Summons which seeks that directions be issued under
Rule 404 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules is infructuous and
is disposed of as such.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Chamber Summons seeking directions under Rule 404 of Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules is maintainable after disposal of related Suit No. 9 of 2015.
Raynah Braganza
Necia Regello
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court