Gopal L.Raheja v. Chandru L.Raheja and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution as the writ of summons had not been served on the defendants despite the suit being filed in 1999.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ASN
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDCITION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 633 OF 2000
Mr.Gopal K. Raheja and ors. ...Plaintiffs. vs. Mr.Chandru L.Raheja and ors. ...Defendants.
...Defendants.
Mr. Harsh Meshani i/by K.D. Abichandani for the plaintiffs. None for the Defendants.
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM, J. DATE : JUNE 10, 2015
PC:
This suit has been filed on 8th December 1999. The Counsel for the plaintiffs states that even as on date the plaintiffs have not even served the writ of summons upon the defendants. In the circumstances, suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court