The court allowed a chamber summons to condone a 55-day delay in filing the defendant's affidavit reply in a summary suit, permitting the reply to be taken on record.
Chamber summons allowed; affidavit reply taken on record; defendant directed to serve copy; rejoinder due by 26.06.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
126.sj.123.2014.ss.836.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 415 OF 2015 WITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 123 OF 2014 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 836 OF 2014
| Mr.Vinod Kishan Gupta | .. Applicant |
|---|---|
| In the matter between : M/s. R.K.B. Global Pvt. Ltd. Vs. |
.. Plaintiff |
| Mr.Vinod Kishan Gupta | .. Defendant |
Mr.Naresh Ratnand i/b Ashwin Ankhad & Associates for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 8TH JUNE 2015
P.C.
condone the delay of 55 days in filing affidavit in reply to the summons for judgment and to take the reply on record. The counsel for the plaintiff states that he has no objection if the chamber summons is allowed and the reply is taken on record.
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
2
126.sj.123.2014.ss.836.2014.doc
same upon the plaintiff within one week from today. Rejoinder, if any, to be
filed and copy served on or before 26.06.2015.
Stand over to 1.07.2015 for hearing.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
Mr. Vinod Kishan Gupta
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
