A Summary Suit号牌 under Order IX Rule 9 CPC where the plaintiff failed to appear despite listing for dismissal, resulting in dismissal by default.
Suit dismissed for default of appearance by plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
910.ss.1822.2000.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1822 OF 2000
The Ruby Mills Ltd. .. Plaintiff
Vs.
Shaheel Bearings Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. .. Defendants
None for plaintiff.
None for defendants.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2015
P.C.
Though the matter was called out twice yesterday, i.e., on 10.06.2015, nobody appeared for the plaintiff. The matter was stood over to today. Even today, nobody is present for the plaintiff though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.
In the circumstances, the suit stands dismissed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PA
Ruby Mills Ltd.
Shaheel Bearings Pvt. Ltd.
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
