The High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted the petitioner leave to withdraw the testamentary review petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings against the 3rd respondent.
Leave to withdraw the review petition granted with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings against the 3rd respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-RTP-1-14-TP-80-04-TS-14-04.DOC
Sharayu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 14 OF 2004
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 80 OF 2004
Vasant Narayan Sardal…Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Ashita Tham & Ors.…Respondents
Mr. M.M. Vashi, Senior Advocate, i/b Kalpesh Nansi, for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Snehal Shah, a/w Balasaheb Deshmukh for the Respondent No. 3
Ms. Neha Bhatt, i/b M/s. Bilawala & Co., Noticee
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 5th March 2015
PC:-
1.Mr. Vashi, learned Senior Counsel for the Review Petitioner,
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to adopt
appropriate proceedings against the 3rd Respondent. Leave granted
with liberty as prayed. No order as to costs.
1 of 2
903-RTP-1-14-TP-80-04-TS-14-04.DOC
2. Notice issued to the previous Attorney on 31st July 2014 is discharged.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Vasant Narayan Sardal
Smt. Ashita Tham
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court