Review Petition No. 4814 of 2015 filed in Writ Petition No. 10048 of 2012 was heard. The Court found no error apparent on the face of the record and no ground for review, therefore rejecting the Revision Petition.
Review Petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
revptnst-4814.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 4814 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10048 OF 2012 A/w WRIT PETITION NO.1860 OF 2014 A/W WRIT PETITION NO.8182 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms.Pradnya Talekar for the Petitioner.
Shri E.P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate along with Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/by M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ DATED : 20TH MARCH 2015
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel representing the Second and Third Respondents.
Petitioner
Respondents 2 and 3
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court