This judgment deals with a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The court held that sufficient cause was made out for condonating the delay and allowed the application.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ca0-707.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 707 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 4814 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10048 OF 2012 A/w WRIT PETITION NO.1860 OF 2014 A/W WRIT PETITION NO.8182 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms.Pradnya Talekar for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Shri E.P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate along with Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/by M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ DATED : 20TH MARCH 2015
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned Senior Counsel representing the Second and Third Respondents.
(G.S.KULKARNI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay in the application.
Applicant
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
A.S. OKA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court