Review petition rejecting challenge that specific communications were ignored, noting absence of record errors or limitation grounds.
Review petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901rewst32899-14.doc
1/2
PVR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (ST.) No.32899 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10172 OF 2013
1.The Chairman, Shri.Shankarrao Shinde Shikshan Mandal & Anr.
... Petitioners
Vs.
1.Shri.Sakharam Mahadeo Mohangekar & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.M.S.Topkar , for the Applicants/Petitioners.
Mr.Bandiwadekar, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI , J. DATE : 24 MARCH, 2015
P.C. :
901rewst32899-14.doc
PVR 2/2
disputed on the part of the Review Petitioners that these documents were neither part of the paper book nor were relied upon by the Review Petitioners in the review petition as also no ground in this regard was urged in the petition. Mr.Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that even before the Tribunal, this issue was not urged on behalf by the Review Petitioners.
is rejected.
( G.S.KULKARNI , J .)
Shankarrao Shinde Shikshan Mandal & Anr.
Shri. Sakharam Mahadeo Mohangekar & Ors.
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
