This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901caw800-15.doc
PVR 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.800 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) No.32899 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10172 OF 2013
1.The Chairman, Shri.Shankarrao Shinde Shikshan Mandal & Anr.
... Applicants/Petitioners
Vs.
1.Shri.Sakharam Mahadeo Mohangekar & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.M.S.Topkar , for the Applicants/Petitioners.
Mr.Bandiwadekar, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI , J. DATE : 24th MARCH, 2015 ----
P.C. :
applicants / petitioners and Mr.Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for
respondent No.1.
PVR 2/2 901caw800-15.doc 3. Having considered the averments as made in the Civil Application, delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
( G.S.KULKARNI , J .)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 103 days in filing the Review Petition requires condonation.
Chairman, Shri. Shankarrao Shinde Shikshan Mandal & Anr.
Shri. Sakharam Mahadeo Mohangekar & Ors.
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
