The petitioners failed to appear in the review petition. The court dismissed the review petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RPW. 4-94
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION No. 4 OF 1994 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 2932 OF 1988
The Commissioner of Sales Tax & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs.
None for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 11, 2015 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioners. It appears that Petitioners are not keen in pursuing the review petition. Hence, review petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
The Commissioner of Sales Tax & Anr.
None for the Petitioner
None for the Respondents
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
