Review petition in arbitration proceedings dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner showed no keenness in pursuing the review.
Review petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RPAL. 34-08
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) No. 34 OF 2008 IN
APPEAL No. 708 OF 2007 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 417 OF 2006 AND
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 433 OF 2006
Shree Sai Enterprises ... Petitioners Vs.
Maharashtra Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents ***
None for the Petitioners.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 11, 2015 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Petitioners. It appears that Review Petitioner is not keen in pursuing the review petition. Hence, review petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Shree Sai Enterprises
Maharashtra Telephone Nigam Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
