This judgment rejects a review petition, holding that the order in question is not amenable to review under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The review petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RPSST16628_2013.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (St.) NO. 16628 OF 2013 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2010
Nitin Babaso Chougule & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs.
Amar Anant Nitawe & Anr.
... Respondents
Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Borkar, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
(In Chamber) DATE : JULY 16, 2015
P.C.:
This Petition is moved for review of the order dated 1st November,
2012 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No. 140 of 2010.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order in Second Appeal No. 140 of 2010 is liable to be reviewed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Whether the review petition falls within the parameters prescribed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitin Babaso Chougule & Anr.
Amar Anant Nitawe & Anr.
Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
