This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAO127_2013.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2013 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.)NO. 16628 OF 2013 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2010
Nitin Babaso Chougule & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs.
Amar Anant Nitawe & Anr.
... Respondents
Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Borkar, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. (In Chamber) DATE : JULY 16, 2015
P.C.:
This Application is moved for condonation of delay of 152 days in filing the review petition.
out for condonation of delay. Hence, the delay of 152 days is condoned.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 152 days in filing the review petition requires condonation under the Civil Procedure Code.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitin Babaso Chougule & Anr.
Amar Anant Nitawe & Anr.
Mrudula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
