Disposed
Sundeep Jugalkishore Gupta v. Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali HUF and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCRP/47/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
964-NMS-1510-2007
Nitin
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURSIDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 11 OF 2007
IN
SUIT NO. 1678 OF 1987
Sundeep J. Gupta
… Petitioner
Versus
Ms. Shreema Doshi i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Company for the Petitioner.
Mr. U. Kazi i/b. Divya Shah for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2015
P.C.:
No. 3 / 2A also expired. In view thereof, only the Defendants to the Suit
are Defendant No. 1 HUF and Defendant No. 4 / 2B. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner / Original Plaintiff as well as the
Nitin 2 / 2 964-NMS-1510-2007
Respondents / original Defendants agree that the Suit is now surviving against Defendant No. 1 HUF and Defendant No. 4 / 2B. In view of this clarification, the Review Petition stands disposed of.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Sundeep J. Gupta
Vijaykumar Purshottam Kabali HUF & Or.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court