A review petition and notice of motion were dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared for the applicants/petitioners on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
967-NMS-253-2012
Nitin
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURSIDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 253 OF 2012
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 10 OF 2012 IN
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 720 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO. 503 OF 1996
Sheela Shanlal Ghai and Ors. … Applicants / Petitioners Versus Snehlata wife of Venktesh and Ors. … Respondents
None for the Applicants / Petitioners. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2015
P.C.:
None for the Applicants / Petitioners. In view thereof, the
Notice of Motion as well as Review Petition are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Sheela Shanlal Ghai and Ors.
Snehlata wife of Venktesh and Ors.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
