Mukesh K. Shah v. Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
4-ARBPL530.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 530 OF 2011
Mukesh Kirchand Shah
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd. & Anr.
….. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms.Frasica Philip, i/b.Kochhar & Co., for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.
DATED : 27th MARCH, 2015
P.C .
In the above matter, Prothonotary and Senior Master had passed conditional order on 21st February, 2012 directing the petitioner to remove office objections and to get the same numbered and register within two weeks after the disposal of Notice of Motion No.2030 of 2011 and Notice of Motion No.2031 of 2011 failing which the petition to stand rejected under Rule 986. By an order dated 26th March, 2014 this court has already rejected the Notice of Motion No.2031 of 2011. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion and in view of the conditional order passed by the learned Prothonotary and Senior Master, petition stands rejected.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
Mukesh Kirchand Shah
Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court