Disposed

Shri. Nivrutti Dhondiram Godse and Anr. v. Union of India, through Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Aug 2015PIL/52/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a PIL concerning building plans approved by the Cantonment Board, Deolali, relying on statements made by respondents that they would submit fresh proposals. The resolution dated October 22, 2013, was held not to be acted upon pending submission of new plans.

What did the court decide?

The resolution dated October 22, 2013, regarding building plans shall not be acted upon pending submission of fresh proposals.

Shri. Nivrutti Dhondiram Godse and Anr. Vs… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2015)

pil52

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.52 OF 2014

¶5

Nivrutti Dhondiram Godse ...Petitioner
vs.
Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr.Sachin Gite for the Petitioner

¶7

Ms Neeta Masurkar a/w Mr. S.G.Thakur and Mr.Arun
Kumar Roy for the respondent-UOI
Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP `A' Panel for respondent Nos.2
and 7.

¶8

Mr.Sukand Kulkarni i/b Mr.Rohan Nahar for respondent
Nos.8 to 10.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
 REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

¶10

 DATE : AUGUST 17, 2015

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

1The challenge in this PIL is to the resolution
dated 22nd October 2013 passed by the Cantonment
Board, Deolali. In the meeting held on 22nd October
2013, three building plans submitted by the
respondent Nos.8,9 and 10 were considered and
approved subject to condition that the plans will be
released only after a survey is carried out by the
appropriate Officer and the boundaries are fixed.
The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.8 to 10
on instructions states that the said respondents
will not act upon the plans which are approved in
the meeting dated 22nd October 2013 and will submit a
fresh proposals/fresh plans for approval of the
Cantonment Board. He states that advance notice of

¶13

pil52

¶14

¶15

the submission of the fresh proposal/fresh plans
will be given to the petitioner to enable the
petitioner to raise appropriate objections, if any.
We accept the said statements made on instructions.
By accepting the said statements, we dispose of the
PIL.

¶16

2We make it clear that in view of aforesaid
statements, the Resolution dated 22nd October 2013 in
relation to the building plans at Sr.Nos.6,7 and 8
placed before the meeting held on 22nd October 2013
shall not be acted upon. All contentions on merits
are expressly kept open. If objections are raised by
thepetitionerstothenewlysubmitted
proposals/plans the same shall be considered by the
Cantonment Board in accordance with law.

¶17

(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Shri. Nivrutti Dhondiram Godse and Anr. v. Union of India, through Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Nivrutti Dhondiram Godse and Anr. v. Union of India, through Ministry of Defence and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagesh Madavi S/O Ashok Madavi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vidarbha Asso. for Res. Tech. and Dev. in Agri. and Rural Sec. Thr. Its Pre. Dr. Balwant G. Bathkal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Others

Gaurang Dinesh Damani Vs Union of India and 33 Ors.

Janata Rahivasi Mandal Chunabhatti and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri Padmakar Janardan Kamble and Anr. Vs Shri. Balwant Moreshwar Purandare and Ors.

Vasant Ganesh Apte Vs Prakash Naiknavare and Ors.

Shri. Hunoorsidha Khelpa Shejale Vs Shri. Vishal Baburao Takmoge and Ors.

Vasant Ganesh Apte Vs Prakash Naiknavare and Ors.

Devi Construction Company and Ors. Vs Maharahstra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Shri Ramchandra Maruti Gundal (Since Deceased) through LRs. Govind Ramchandra Gundal and Anr. Vs Shri Vikas Deshmukh Collector of Pune and Ors.

Sou. Arusha Sampat Dawkhar Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary to Govt. and Ors.

Metro Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Mah. and Ors.

Kajupada Shri Gajanan Kripa Co-Op Hsg.Soc.Ltd. Vs Mun.Corpn of Gr.Bombay and Ors.

Shri N.B.Vaidya and Ors. Vs Mun.Corpn. of Gr. Bombay